There is no law without corruption. In Mexico, everything must change, starting with broadening the legal profile of a public official, whether a crime is proven or not. Their efforts are considerable. Ethics is characterized by the absence of universal values and respect. Its changing dynamics allow us to immerse ourselves in an upside-down world. We even have to change judgments or decisions. We are all in this together. that it is up to both of us to work together, just to cooperate and expand the panoramas of the world and how we perceive them. Based on the above, we assume that in order to ensure maximum flexibility in the process, the alternative judicial law of the State of Chihuahua does not deal in depth with procedural aspects, but simply states that: “The procedure provided for in this Law, its regulations and other applicable provisions shall be followed.” 32 In that regard, the law merely lays down the detailed rules for initiating proceedings at the request of a party or on referral by the court, 33 in order to give the institution the power to determine whether the dispute may be lawfully settled by ADR and devotes certain articles to the subject matter of conventions and agreements to which they may agree. The parties arrive – form, total and partial non-compliance, limitation period – and nothing else.34 With regard to the regulation, which could shed more light on the matter, it should be noted that none have been adopted to date.35 Second, legal issues are characterized by high costs. In some States, there is the Public Defender, who guarantees everyone free access to justice, but in practice there is a certain mistrust on the part of the citizen with regard to this figure, due to the excessive number of issues he deals with and the low salary he receives, which leads to the use of professional services. which means high fees. Since the reform of article 17 in June 2008, the Federal Constitution of the United Mexican States has introduced alternative dispute settlement mechanisms into the national legal system as a human right.
Thus, alternative justice reaches its peak because of the constitutional provision, which makes it binding on all areas of law. In accordance with the guidelines set out by the Constitution in this area, this article attempts to determine whether government regulations guarantee effective access to justice through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms by analyzing the new law on alternative justice in the state of Chihuahua as a case study. So far, talking about access to justice is necessarily associated with presuppositions inherent in their work, such as: (i) the renunciation of private vengeance by the individual; (ii) public or private bodies responsible for the administration of justice; (iii) both adjective and instrumental legislation; (iv) fully identifiable jurisdictions; (v) legitimate solutions or agreements to disputes raised; (vi) competent and impartial judges or third parties within a given legal framework; Therefore, it is necessary to start from a legal definition or description of these mechanisms in order to objectively identify their structural elements, the relationship of their existence, their advantages and disadvantages. It is true that ADR procedures are simple, accessible, effective, etc. In order to achieve their objective of access to justice in general, it is also true that they must ensure legal certainty and seek the greatest possible respect for fundamental rights, public order and the public interest.36 It should be noted that there are important supranational and governmental initiatives37 at international level which agree on: certain fundamental procedural aspects that all regulations must take into account in order to provide a such legal certainty to the parties, and which, unfortunately, we do not find in the law analyzed and which should be taken into account when drafting the regulations indicated in the regulations, such as: Buenrostro, Rosalia et al., Alternative Justice and Indictment System, Mexico, Technical Secretariat of the Coordination Council for the Implementation of the Criminal Justice System, 2012, p.