If the photo is not legal, we can help and guide you to Ejevial so that you can defend yourself and appeal. The shortened service period is the main reason for the ineffectiveness of the regulation, since, if they are not communicated within this period, they do not have a legal-administrative application, another obligation of the CPACA is that this summons for service, which it transmits via the administrative act (comparendo), must contain a complete copy. Authentic and free for the contents of the plot, it is that the eventual author of the Comparendo must receive the evidence that supports it (the photo of inflation (photofine)), if it is not sent so, it is understood that the notification has not been given. In summary, with the C-038 judgment of the Court of Justice in Colombia, there is no joint and several liability between the owner and the offending driver (this does not apply to buses, taxis and other public service vehicles). Send feedback on the rating. Your email address will not be published. This section is not intended for legal advice or advice, which should be sought from a lawyer. Hi, I get a fine photo for speeding, (I`m from Santa Fe) 122 km / h while the maximum is 110. I did not see any sign or cone indicating that there was a radar, the place where the photo was taken is more than 2 km from an urbanized area, i.e. it was a mobile radar.
Can I exempt or do I have to pay the fine? Thank you hello. I had made a photo ticket for speeding, I wanted to know if it was legal because I understand that you can not take pictures from the front, moreover there was no indication of any speed control. If the driver`s data is not updated, the notification may reach an address that no longer belongs to you. In this case, the violation is deemed to have been legally indicated. If the individual does not have a registered address or if mail is returned to that address, notification will be made by means of a notice published on the Company`s website. Good evening Sergio, the comment concerns a fine photo that came to me from the municipality of Chamical in La Rioja, check and the mobile radars are approved, but the photo they took is absolutely nothing, or patent, nothing. How do I know if this is really my vehicle? I also don`t remember seeing any warning signs or cones or anything. How do I proceed? Anything that can help me? In some cases, the photo penalty is imposed according to legal provisions and corresponds to an appropriate procedure, if you wish, you can create this “checklist” to check each requirement: Hello..
You`re welcome. I was fined by the province of BA for “not respecting the prescribed speed limits”. Now, then. The notification does not contain any information about the speed limit or the speed at which I passed, or the instrument with which it was measured. I have looked at Decree 532/09 and it does not mention these points either. Can you help me find out if the discharge is suitable or not? Hello a request, coincidentally on the page of prov fines. From BSA I have three fines, two for crossing in red and / 0 intersection with the low barrier and another for speeding, all three from the same municipality that is halfway between my home and my work or that means I travel frequently. The doubt is that it does not say what method they used, nor that there is no photo, only the date, reason and place.
I know there are cameras, but I assumed the camera shows its location with a sign indicating that the camera is looking. These cameras also function as an injury element or simply security? Because I never stopped a traffic policeman or they made a recording for me at the time. Does the photo, when I go to church, have to give it to me to verify this? thank you Hello, good. I come from the province of Tucumán, the capital. Consultation: Tuesday 19. June 2018, I received a notification of violation from the municipality of Chascomus, province of Buenos Aires, but it had already expired on 15.06.2018. What I do not know is whether the radar equipment used is authorized and whether the administrative act of violation is legal. In addition, on Thursday 21/06/2018, I enter the web address (www.infraccionesBA.net) that I indicated in the notification and it turns out that there are three other violations (one from Dolores, one from Castelli and another from Tordillo), for the same reason, on the same day of the violation, that I was not notified and also expired. What I don`t know is whether these violations are legal because they don`t provide details like the notification that came to me. I registered on this site and it allowed me to extend the expiration of all for later and thus print a kind of paycheck. I have already emailed the ANSV with the violations and they only sent me to see a link on the radars. Are these administrative acts of counterfeiting lawful? I would be grateful if you would guide me.
Best wishes. However, not all photofines are legal, because the photofin, for it to be legal, must meet the legal and constitutional requirements, if a photofine violates a legal requirement, the person who received it can defend himself. It is necessary for a traffic officer to validate the regulation within 10 working days and verify its existence or legality, and these are essential to know whether the fine can be defended. Hello! I have to make inquiries: I was fined in Santa Fe, which is subject to national provision. How can I resolve this issue to appeal the fine? Also, the limit was 60 km and I went to 66 (what is the margin), and my driver`s license is not in the photos (it`s not even clear). Thank you very much! But it is important not only to pay attention to what the law says, but also to check the jurisdiction in which the fine was imposed to check whether this legislation applies to it or not. “Public transit is a local matter. If this happens on a national road, these elements must be taken into account. However, if this happens on the highway, but at the height of a city, after the entrance sign of the “urban area”, it already depends on whether or not this municipality complies with national legislation. The same thing happens on provincial highways,” reads the reference in Road Safety. And another question, in the case of a photo penalty that does not apply to speeding, but to the entrance to a pedestrian bridge, where do I consult if the camera is approved and if the fine is valid? Since it is not a cinematometer, it does not appear in the INTI list. At the time of receiving a photo penalty, the person must agree to certain conditions to recognize that it is legal.
You need to be sure that the breach actually took place. In any case, in Colombia, all authorities are subject to the principle of legality and, therefore, the transport company must comply with legal and constitutional requirements for the photo penalty to be valid. Hello, I received a photo, but the photo is blurry and the photo does not read the traffic speed. It is given as a transcript in the protocol, but cannot be read in the photo. Basically, I have to “believe” that traffic speed is what they bring in. Is the fine valid? Thank you very much! Very good service on this page. Visit the Oregon Department of Justice`s electronic court payment page to make payment of the fine indicated on your summons. Visit the website to find out if you are entitled to a reduction in the fine. Hi Sergio.
I advise you. I have a photo fine from 2017, for speeding. 123 km/h if the maximum is 110. The problem is that the radar does not have signaling in the same way, only the maximum 110 is displayed about 500 meters before. Is it legal for it not to be reported? I THEREFORE MAKE THE DISCLAIMER BY INVOKING THE LACK OF SIGNAGE. Thanks to the fact that several factors can arise in the illegality of the finesse of the photo, the traffic officer must check this.